Did Pfizer’s vaccine documents reveal 1,291 side effects? !

Did recently released documents from Pfizer on their mRNA vaccine clinical trials reveal that it had 1,291 side effects?!

Take a look at the viral claim and find out what the facts really are!

To claim : Pfizer Vaccine Documents Reveal 1,291 Side Effects!

People are sharing a press release from Children’s Health Defense (CHD), which went viral after being posted by Yahoo.

It’s a long read, so feel free to skip to the next section for the facts…

In a 55,000-page set of documents released on Tuesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) is allowing the public for the first time to access data that Pfizer has submitted to the FDA from its clinical trials in support of a Covid-19 vaccine license.

This follows U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman’s January 6 ruling to deny the FDA’s request to suppress the data for the next 75 years, which the agency said was necessary, in part, in because of its “limited resources”.

Truth : Pfizer’s vaccine documents did DO NOT Reveal 1,291 side effects!

This is yet another example of fake vaccine news created and propagated by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), and here are the reasons why…

Fact #1: This was a children’s health advocacy article

The “news” that was published on Yahoo News was actually an article by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

Yahoo News released the statement irresponsibly, without first verifying it, or making it clear that it was a CHD statement and not an actual report.

They’ve since taken it down, but the Yahoo News links and screenshots continue to circulate on social media, giving it credit.

Fact #2: FDA didn’t ask to delete data for 75 years

This is a completely false statement, which I fact checked Last year. The FDA did not ask to delete data from Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine trial.

It was the “interpretation” of Aaron Siri, the lawyer for PHMPT (Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency) – the group asking for the data the FDA used to authorize the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

The truth is that the FDA had already released over 12,000 pages of the 329,000 pages requested by the end of January 2022, and would have completed delivery of all documents in about 5.5 years.

Read more : Did the FDA ask for 75 years to release Pfizer vaccine data?

Did the FDA ask for 75 years to release Pfizer vaccine data?

Fact #3: The Pfizer document was published in December 2021


This document was submitted to the PHMPT, which quickly published it publicly on December 20, 2021.

In other words, the CHD had more than two months to read this document, before publishing their statement, which is why it is so strange that they were wrong…

Fact #4: Pfizer’s document failed to reveal 1,291 side effects

Pfizer’s “bombshell” document lists reports of adverse effects, primarily from AMERICAN VAERS and United Kingdom yellow map systems, as part of the post-authorisation safety monitoring requirement.

CHD’s claim that the Pfizer vaccine has 1,291 side effects is based on a “List of adverse events of particular interest(AESI) on pages 30 to 38 of the document.

The truth is – this was NOT a list of side effects caused by Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine. Rather, it was a list of side effects that Pfizer was specifically looking for in reports of adverse events.

What CHD has done is like putting a list of prosecutable crimes in legislation and calling it a list of crimes that the government has actually committed. It’s really stupid.

Fact #5: AESI list not specific to the Pfizer vaccine

The list of adverse events of particular concern is not specific to Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine. It’s actually on page 16 of the document.

The company’s AESI list takes into consideration the AESI lists of the following expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary AESI list for VAERS monitoring), MHRA (directive unpublished).

AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general.

These AESIs are usually specified before clinical trials are even beginning, although new ones may be added later.

Fact #6: Pfizer’s document showed no new security issues

Instead of reading the document, CHD seemed to have spent its time counting the number of side effects Pfizer was looking for.

If they read the Discussion and Summary + conclusion sections, they would have noted that the data:

  • revealed no “new security issues or risks”
  • support “a favorable benefit-risk profile” of the vaccine

In other words, the Pfizer document pointed out that despite searching for 1,291 potential dangers, they found no new vaccine-related risks.

Don’t risk your life or that of your family on the bad science and misinformation promoted by fringe groups like the CHD.

Please help me fight fake news by sharing this fact check with your family and friends!

Thank you for supporting my work !

Support my work by bank transfer / PayPal / credit card!

Name: Adrian Wong
Payment : CIMB 7064555917 (Swift Code: CIBBMYKL)
Bank card / Paypal: https://paypal.me/techarp

Dr. Adrian Wong has been writing about technology and science since 1997, even publishing a book with Prentice Hall titled Breaking the BIOS Barrier (ISBN 978-0131455368) during his medical studies.

He continues to devote countless hours each day to writing about technology, medicine and science, in his quest for facts in a post-truth world.

recommended reading

Support TechARP!

Please support us by visit our sponsorsparticipating in the ARP Tech ForumsWhere donate to our fund. Thank you!

Previous Yashoraj Tyagi, Chief Commercial and Technical Officer, CASHe
Next Fintech firm PowerPlay expands into home solar power with new lending platform